chapter-level decision records generated from the live translation registry
The evidence beneath the English
Every consequential choice
leaves a record.
The published library was developed through direct Greek analysis, lexical work, and manuscript comparison. Where surviving witnesses materially disagree, the competing Greek readings and their effect on English remain open to the reader.
public provenance schema, designed to remain machine-readable and auditable
standardized inspectable Greek reference edition
Textual basis
SBL Greek New Testament
Edited by Michael W. Holmes. The project's standardized, publicly inspectable Greek reference edition. It is not presented as retroactive proof that every existing chapter originated from one uniform printed edition.
This is an honest reference claim, not a retroactive claim that all completed work began from one uniform printed edition. Material manuscript forks remain independently documented at the reading they affect.
Translation record
1 Corinthians 3
John707 recordsMark525 recordsMatthew987 recordsLuke929 recordsActs1146 records1 Thessalonians67 recordsGalatians138 records1 Corinthians357 records2 Corinthians250 recordsRomans340 recordsPhilippians84 recordsPhilemon22 recordsColossians74 recordsEphesians121 records2 Thessalonians36 records1 Timothy86 records1 Peter90 records2 Peter61 records1 John107 records2 John10 records3 John13 recordsJude23 recordsRevelation324 records
122 records218 records322 records425 records512 records615 records728 records812 records921 records1021 records1123 records1224 records1313 records1431 records1548 records1622 records
1 corinthians.3.cor3ServantsText
Τί ... Ἀπολλῶς; τί ... Παῦλος; διάκονοι / Τίς ... Παῦλος; τίς ... Ἀπολλῶς; ἀλλʼ ἢ διάκονοι
TEXTmoderate confidence
How does verse 5 frame Paul and Apollos?
The critical text asks what Apollos and Paul are and answers ‘servants’; RP asks who Paul and Apollos are and adds ‘nothing but.’
Why this default
The SBLGNT/critical sequence and ‘what’ questions are retained without RP’s added ‘nothing but’; the RP form remains available as a coherent alternate composition.
Evidence
ExternalΤί ... Ἀπολλῶς; τί ... Παῦλος; διάκονοι — WH, Treg, NA28; Τίς ... Παῦλος; τίς ... Ἀπολλῶς; ἀλλʼ ἢ διάκονοι — RP.
InternalThe RP form normalizes questions about persons from ‘what’ to ‘who,’ restores Paul before Apollos, and makes the implied depreciation explicit with ‘nothing but’; the critical form is terser and more rhetorically abrupt.
Project defaultWhat then is Apollos? And what is Paul? Servants through whom you trusted
Project default · SBLGNT/critical form
WitnessesSBLGNT; WH, Treg, NA28AlternativeWho then is Paul, and who is Apollos? Nothing but servants through whom you trusted
Robinson-Pierpont form
WitnessesRPAlternativeWhat is Apollos, then? What is Paul? They are servants through whom you trusted
Critical reading · syntax smoothed
Record integrity
One registry drives both the reader and this record.
The manifest is regenerated from the translation source before every production build. Its source digest is 7c4cbee907fbc0e84976d6e78a615134e2288f8197ce8abcf67b0452155ddc84.
Decision-level revision history begins with this ledger. Earlier development is not reconstructed into false precision; future material changes can be appended to the relevant record with their reason and date.