chapter-level decision records generated from the live translation registry
The evidence beneath the English
Every consequential choice
leaves a record.
The published library was developed through direct Greek analysis, lexical work, and manuscript comparison. Where surviving witnesses materially disagree, the competing Greek readings and their effect on English remain open to the reader.
public provenance schema, designed to remain machine-readable and auditable
standardized inspectable Greek reference edition
Textual basis
SBL Greek New Testament
Edited by Michael W. Holmes. The project's standardized, publicly inspectable Greek reference edition. It is not presented as retroactive proof that every existing chapter originated from one uniform printed edition.
This is an honest reference claim, not a retroactive claim that all completed work began from one uniform printed edition. Material manuscript forks remain independently documented at the reading they affect.
Translation record
John 21
John707 recordsMark525 recordsMatthew987 recordsLuke929 recordsActs1146 records1 Thessalonians67 recordsGalatians138 records1 Corinthians357 records2 Corinthians250 recordsRomans340 recordsPhilippians84 recordsPhilemon22 recordsColossians74 recordsEphesians121 records2 Thessalonians36 records1 Timothy86 records1 Peter90 records2 Peter61 records1 John107 records2 John10 records3 John13 recordsJude23 recordsRevelation324 records
139 records219 records328 records441 records540 records656 records741 records845 records932 records1035 records1143 records1238 records1330 records1427 records1525 records1628 records1724 records1831 records1932 records2028 records2125 records
john.21.sideDish21
μή τι προσφάγιον ἔχετε;
GRAMMARTRANSLATIONmoderate confidence
What does Jesus ask whether they have?
The shore-side question asks whether the disciples possess anything to accompany a meal after their unsuccessful fishing.
Why this default
‘Anything to eat with the bread’ is the working default because prosphagion names accompaniment-food rather than using the ordinary noun for fish, and the question expects a negative answer. ‘Fish’ is the obvious contextual referent, but inserting it hides John’s unusual lexical choice.
Evidence
ExternalNo separate external-evidence note is recorded for this stable-text decision.
InternalThe decision record relies on the stated lexical, grammatical, or translation rationale.
Project defaultyou do not have anything to eat with the bread, do you?
Project default · lexical sense
Alternativeyou have no fish, do you?
Contextual referent
Alternativedo you have any food?
General English
Record integrity
One registry drives both the reader and this record.
The manifest is regenerated from the translation source before every production build. Its source digest is 7c4cbee907fbc0e84976d6e78a615134e2288f8197ce8abcf67b0452155ddc84.
Decision-level revision history begins with this ledger. Earlier development is not reconstructed into false precision; future material changes can be appended to the relevant record with their reason and date.