chapter-level decision records generated from the live translation registry
The evidence beneath the English
Every consequential choice
leaves a record.
The published library was developed through direct Greek analysis, lexical work, and manuscript comparison. Where surviving witnesses materially disagree, the competing Greek readings and their effect on English remain open to the reader.
public provenance schema, designed to remain machine-readable and auditable
standardized inspectable Greek reference edition
Textual basis
SBL Greek New Testament
Edited by Michael W. Holmes. The project's standardized, publicly inspectable Greek reference edition. It is not presented as retroactive proof that every existing chapter originated from one uniform printed edition.
This is an honest reference claim, not a retroactive claim that all completed work began from one uniform printed edition. Material manuscript forks remain independently documented at the reading they affect.
Translation record
Luke 19
John707 recordsMark525 recordsMatthew987 recordsLuke929 recordsActs1146 records1 Thessalonians67 recordsGalatians138 records1 Corinthians357 records2 Corinthians250 recordsRomans340 recordsPhilippians84 recordsPhilemon22 recordsColossians74 recordsEphesians121 records2 Thessalonians36 records1 Timothy86 records1 Peter90 records2 Peter61 records1 John107 records2 John10 records3 John13 recordsJude23 recordsRevelation324 records
144 records236 records330 records433 records530 records637 records738 records842 records947 records1042 records1144 records1245 records1335 records1435 records1532 records1629 records1732 records1839 records1942 records2039 records2137 records2253 records2344 records2444 records
luke.19.lk19TenMinasVerse
καὶ εἶπαν αὐτῷ ... / omission
TEXTmoderate confidence
Does the bystanders’ objection appear in verse 25?
Most witnesses include the objection; an early Western stream omits the entire sentence.
Why this default
The objection is included by default because it has overwhelmingly broad support; the Western omission is still consequential enough to display.
Evidence
ExternalInclusion is overwhelmingly broad; omission has a coherent Western stream.
InternalThe verse could be omitted through narrative compression, while insertion from Matthew does not closely match the wording.
Project defaultThey said to him, ‘Lord, he has ten minas!’
Project default · broad tradition
Witnessesκαὶ εἶπαν αὐτῷ, κύριε, ἔχει δέκα μνᾶς — א, A, B, L, Θ, Ψ, families 1 and 13, Byzantine witnessesAlternative[The bystanders’ objection is omitted.]
D, W and Western support
Witnessesentire sentence omitted — D, W, 69, 1230, Old Latin and Western supportAlternative[They said to him, ‘Lord, he has ten minas!’]
Sentence visibly marked
Witnessessentence included or omitted — fork displayedRecord integrity
One registry drives both the reader and this record.
The manifest is regenerated from the translation source before every production build. Its source digest is 7c4cbee907fbc0e84976d6e78a615134e2288f8197ce8abcf67b0452155ddc84.
Decision-level revision history begins with this ledger. Earlier development is not reconstructed into false precision; future material changes can be appended to the relevant record with their reason and date.