chapter-level decision records generated from the live translation registry
The evidence beneath the English
Every consequential choice
leaves a record.
John, Mark, Matthew, and Luke were developed through direct Greek analysis, lexical work, and manuscript comparison. Where surviving witnesses materially disagree, the competing Greek readings and their effect on English remain open to the reader.
public provenance schema, designed to remain machine-readable and auditable
standardized inspectable Greek reference edition
Textual basis
SBL Greek New Testament
Edited by Michael W. Holmes. The project's standardized, publicly inspectable Greek reference edition. It is not presented as retroactive proof that every existing chapter originated from one uniform printed edition.
This is an honest reference claim, not a retroactive claim that all completed work began from one uniform printed edition. Material manuscript forks remain independently documented at the reading they affect.
Translation record
Matthew 16
matthew.16.mt16PeopleSay
τίνα λέγουσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι εἶναι ... / τίνα με λέγουσιν
Does Jesus ask who people say ‘the Son of Man’ is, or who they say ‘I’ am?
The witnesses differ over the explicit pronoun ‘me,’ producing two closely related question forms.
Why this default
The concise question about the Son of Man is default because it is preserved in strong early evidence. The explicit ‘me’ is ancient and widespread and makes the connection to Jesus unambiguous.
Evidence
ExternalWithout explicit ‘me’: B and important early versional/patristic support; with ‘me’ in several word orders: א, C, D, W, Θ, families 1/13, 33, 579, 700, 892 and the broad later tradition.
InternalAdding ‘me’ assimilates the question to the disciples’ answer and the Synoptic parallels; omission could also occur in the crowded word order.
Project default · concise early form
Witnessesτίνα λέγουσιν ... τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου · B, early versionsBroad explicit-pronoun form
Witnessesτίνα με λέγουσιν ... τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου · א, C, D, W, Θ, broad traditionFork visible in-line
WitnessesDisplay option · pronoun bracketedRecord integrity
One registry drives both the reader and this record.
The manifest is regenerated from the translation source before every production build. Its source digest is 450adc54c1fc782fbae5e9ed6a640a2ae0e3be080722ac134c84e1248c2a312a.
Decision-level revision history begins with this ledger. Earlier development is not reconstructed into false precision; future material changes can be appended to the relevant record with their reason and date.