chapter-level decision records generated from the live translation registry
The evidence beneath the English
Every consequential choice
leaves a record.
John, Mark, Matthew, and Luke were developed through direct Greek analysis, lexical work, and manuscript comparison. Where surviving witnesses materially disagree, the competing Greek readings and their effect on English remain open to the reader.
public provenance schema, designed to remain machine-readable and auditable
standardized inspectable Greek reference edition
Textual basis
SBL Greek New Testament
Edited by Michael W. Holmes. The project's standardized, publicly inspectable Greek reference edition. It is not presented as retroactive proof that every existing chapter originated from one uniform printed edition.
This is an honest reference claim, not a retroactive claim that all completed work began from one uniform printed edition. Material manuscript forks remain independently documented at the reading they affect.
Translation record
Matthew 19
matthew.19.mt19GoodReply
τί με ἐρωτᾷς περὶ τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ; εἷς ἐστιν ὁ ἀγαθός
How does Jesus answer the question about good?
The earliest form asks why the man questions Jesus about ‘the good.’ The later form closely matches Mark and Luke: ‘Why do you call me good?’
Why this default
The question ‘Why ask me about the good?’ is default because it matches the earliest Matthean evidence and explains why copyists replaced it with the much more familiar Synoptic wording.
Evidence
ExternalCritical form: א, B, D, L, Θ, family 1, 33 and early versions; ‘Why call me good?’ form: C, K, W, Δ, family 13 and broad later tradition.
InternalAssimilation to Mark 10:18 and Luke 18:19 explains both the altered question and the added explicit ‘God’ more readily than the reverse.
Project default · critical text
Witnessesτί με ἐρωτᾷς περὶ τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ ... εἷς ἐστιν ὁ ἀγαθός · א, B, D, L, Θ, f¹, 33Later Synoptic form
Witnessesτί με λέγεις ἀγαθόν ... οὐδεὶς ἀγαθὸς εἰ μὴ εἷς ὁ θεός · C, K, W, Δ, f¹³, later traditionFork visible in-line
WitnessesDisplay option · competing sentences shownRecord integrity
One registry drives both the reader and this record.
The manifest is regenerated from the translation source before every production build. Its source digest is 450adc54c1fc782fbae5e9ed6a640a2ae0e3be080722ac134c84e1248c2a312a.
Decision-level revision history begins with this ledger. Earlier development is not reconstructed into false precision; future material changes can be appended to the relevant record with their reason and date.