chapter-level decision records generated from the live translation registry
The evidence beneath the English
Every consequential choice
leaves a record.
The published library was developed through direct Greek analysis, lexical work, and manuscript comparison. Where surviving witnesses materially disagree, the competing Greek readings and their effect on English remain open to the reader.
public provenance schema, designed to remain machine-readable and auditable
standardized inspectable Greek reference edition
Textual basis
SBL Greek New Testament
Edited by Michael W. Holmes. The project's standardized, publicly inspectable Greek reference edition. It is not presented as retroactive proof that every existing chapter originated from one uniform printed edition.
This is an honest reference claim, not a retroactive claim that all completed work began from one uniform printed edition. Material manuscript forks remain independently documented at the reading they affect.
Translation record
Romans 4
John707 recordsMark525 recordsMatthew987 recordsLuke929 recordsActs1146 records1 Thessalonians67 recordsGalatians138 records1 Corinthians357 records2 Corinthians250 recordsRomans340 recordsPhilippians84 recordsPhilemon22 recordsColossians74 recordsEphesians121 records2 Thessalonians36 records1 Timothy86 records1 Peter90 records2 Peter61 records1 John107 records2 John10 records3 John13 recordsJude23 recordsRevelation324 records
130 records223 records324 records419 records520 records618 records719 records830 records925 records1016 records1127 records1216 records1312 records1418 records1525 records1618 records
romans.4.rom4AbrahamQuestion
τί ... εὑρηκέναι Ἀβραὰμ
TEXTTRANSLATIONlow confidence
Does Paul ask what Abraham found, or more broadly what shall be said about him?
The infinitive’s placement and competing word order allow ‘what Abraham found’ or a broader question about him.
Why this default
The default follows SBLGNT’s infinitive and word order by asking what Abraham ‘found’; the alternative reflects the shorter/reordered textual tradition as a broader question about Abraham.
Evidence
ExternalNo separate external-evidence note is recorded for this stable-text decision.
InternalThe decision record relies on the stated lexical, grammatical, or translation rationale.
Project defaultWhat, then, shall we say that Abraham, our ancestor according to flesh, found?
Project default · SBLGNT wording
Witnessesεὑρηκέναι Ἀβραὰμ τὸν προπάτορα ἡμῶν · SBLGNTAlternativeWhat, then, shall we say about Abraham, our forefather according to flesh?
Variant wording and placement
Witnessesvariant infinitive placement/omission and πατέρα wording · WH, Treg, NA28, RPRecord integrity
One registry drives both the reader and this record.
The manifest is regenerated from the translation source before every production build. Its source digest is 7c4cbee907fbc0e84976d6e78a615134e2288f8197ce8abcf67b0452155ddc84.
Decision-level revision history begins with this ledger. Earlier development is not reconstructed into false precision; future material changes can be appended to the relevant record with their reason and date.